iLife v. Nintendo: Jury slaps Nintendo with $10.1M verdict for infringing patent despite IPR proceedings invalidating five other iLife patents Posted on October 09, 2017 iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-4987-M, (D.N. Tex. 2017, Aug. 31, 2017) verdict hosted by ipwatchdog.com On August 31, 2017, a jury found Nintendo of America, Inc. (“Nintendo”) infringed upon a patent owned by iLife Technologies, Inc. (“iLife”), a medical technology firm located in Texas. The jury found that four games for Nintendo’s Wii U infringed upon...
Continue reading

People of the State of California v. Equifax: San Francisco becomes the first city to sue Equifax over the massive data breach earlier this year. Posted on October 08, 2017 People of the State of Cal. v. Equifax, Inc., No. CGC-17-561529 (S.F. Super. Ct. filed Sept. 26, 2017) complaint hosted by consumerfinancemonitor.com On September 26, 2017, the City of San Francisco (“the City”) initiated a suit against Equifax in a state court stemming from a data breach that occurred earlier this year. The City claimed Equifax has acted unlawfully, unfairly, and/or...
Continue reading

Senate Introduces Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act Posted on October 07, 2017 Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, S. 1693, 115th Cong. (2017). On August 1, 2017, Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) introduced the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (“SESTA”). On September 19, 2017, The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on SESTA. The stated purpose of the bill is to amend the Communications Decency Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C...
Continue reading

Adblocking Software Not Illegal “Aggressive Business Practice,” Says German Appellate Court Posted on October 06, 2017 OLG München, Aug. 17, 2017, U 2225/15 Kart, slip opinion hosted by gesetze-bayern.de. OLG München, Aug. 17, 2017, U 2184/15 Kart, slip opinion hosted by gesetze-bayern.de. OLG München, Aug. 17, 2017, U 1917/16 Kart; full-text not yet available. In three separate appeals cases this summer, the second-instance court in Munich, Germany ruled for Eyeo GmbH, the makers of the popular adblocking software, Adblock...
Continue reading

Matal v. Tam: SCOTUS Rules Disparagement Clause in Lanham Act Unconstitutional Posted on October 05, 2017 Matal v. Tam 582 U. S. ____ (2017), hosted by IPWatchdog. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Federal Circuit, holding that the statutory ban on disparaging trademarks is a violation of free speech. Specifically, they ruled that the “disparagement clause” of the 1946 Lanham Act - the primary federal trademark statute in the US - unconstitutionally limited free speech and is...
Continue reading