China’s Cybersecurity Future and its Impact on U.S. Business Posted on October 31, 2019 Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Gong'an Bu 中华人民共和国公安部 [The Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China], Wangluo Anquan Jibie Baohu Tiaoli (网络安全级别保护条例) [Multi-level Protection of Information Security] (June 27, 2018) (China). China is implementing its newest cybersecurity standards (“MLPS 2.0”) on December 1, which will require companies to make their networks transparent to Chinese government agencies and to install...
Continue reading

Sen. Wyden Introduces Federal Data Privacy Bill Posted on October 30, 2019 Mind Your Own Business Act of 2019, S.2637, 116th Cong. (2019). Two weeks ago, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) released a draft of a new federal data privacy bill, known as the “Mind Your Own Business Act”, that would, if enacted, empower the Federal Trade Commision (“FTC”) to regulate companies' use of consumer data, and create criminal penalties, including prison sentences...
Continue reading

People v. Austin: Is Revenge Porn Constitutionally Protected Speech? Posted on October 29, 2019 People v. Austin, No. 123910, 2019 WL 1870855 (Ill. Oct 18, 2019). On October 18, 2019, the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois decided that prohibiting the nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images does not unconstitutionally restrict freedom of speech, upholding Illinois’ “revenge porn” statute, 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b) (West 2016) (“Section 11-23.5(b)”). In the case, defendant Bethany Austin discovered...
Continue reading

Patagonia v. Anheuser-Busch: District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss in “PATAGONIA on Beer” Trademark Litigation Posted on October 28, 2019 Patagonia, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, No. 2:19-CV-02702-VAP-JEM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2019), order hosted by IPWatchdog. On September 3rd, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied all five of defendant Anheuser-Busch (“AB”)’s motions to dismiss in its ongoing trademark litigation with the outdoor gear company Patagonia, Inc. The dispute centers on the registered trademark...
Continue reading

Section 215 of the Patriot Act Expected to Sunset in December Posted on October 28, 2019 Section 215 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (“USA PATRIOT Act”), 50 U.S.C. § 1861 (2012). Together with two other PATRIOT Act Provisions, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act is set to sunset on December 15, 2019, unless Congress renews it. After the sunset, the U.S...
Continue reading

Google v. CNIL: EU Rules that Right to be Forgotten Does Not Apply Globally Posted on October 17, 2019 C‑507/17, Google LLC v. CNIL, 2019 EUR-Lex CELEX No. 62017CJ0507 (Sept. 24, 2019). On September 24, 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“the Court”) held that the “right to be forgotten” does not require a search engine to de-list search results on all of its domains. However, a search engine operator is still required to de-list search...
Continue reading

UK Intellectual Property Office Publishes Study on Trends in Female Inventorship Posted on October 17, 2019 Intellectual Property Office (U.K.), Gender Profiles in Worldwide Patenting: An Analysis of Female Inventorship (2019). On October 2, 2019, the UK Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”) published Gender profiles in worldwide patenting. The report analyzes trends in worldwide female inventorship over a twenty year period (1998–2017) using data from the European Patent Office Worldwide Patent Statistical Database. The IPO found that...
Continue reading

Victory Processing v. Fox: Montana Ban on Political Robocalls Violates First Amendment Posted on October 15, 2019 Victory Processing, LLC. v. Fox, 937 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019). The Ninth Circuit struck down a Montana law prohibiting political robocalls, finding that it violated the First Amendment. While Montana Attorney General Tim Fox argued that the robocall ban protected Montana citizens’ privacy rights, the court found that prohibiting the calls based on their content was unconstitutional. Victory Processing...
Continue reading

Rovi v. Comcast: Mixed Ruling in Ongoing Patent Infringement Suit Posted on October 15, 2019 Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Corp., No. 16-CV-9278 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019), opinion hosted by Justia. On September 30, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled to grant in part and deny in part a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement by Comcast Corp. (“Comcast”) against Rovi Guides, Inc. (“Rovi”), a subsidiary...
Continue reading

NRA v. City of San Francisco: Does San Francisco’s Resolution Declaring the NRA a “Terrorist Organization” Violate the First Amendment? Posted on October 15, 2019 Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, National Rifle Ass’n v. City of San Francisco, et al., No 3:19-cv-5669 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2019), complaint hosted by CBS SF BayArea. On September 9, 2019, the National Rifle Association of America (“NRA”) brought a lawsuit against the City and County of San Francisco (“San Francisco”) and members of San Francisco’s Board of...
Continue reading