Submit to Digest

Rovi v. Comcast: Mixed Ruling in Ongoing Patent Infringement Suit

By Jessica Li - Edited by Grant Fergusson
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Corp., No. 16-CV-9278 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019), opinion hosted by Justia. On September 30, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled to grant in part and deny in part a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement by Comcast Corp. (“Comcast”) against Rovi Guides, Inc. (“Rovi”), a subsidiary...
Continue reading
Reports Patent
NRA v. City of San Francisco: Does San Francisco’s Resolution Declaring the NRA a “Terrorist Organization” Violate the First Amendment?

By Sasha Peters - Edited by Natassia Velez
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, National Rifle Ass’n v. City of San Francisco, et al., No 3:19-cv-5669 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2019), complaint hosted by CBS SF BayArea. On September 9, 2019, the National Rifle Association of America (“NRA”) brought a lawsuit against the City and County of San Francisco (“San Francisco”) and members of San Francisco’s Board of...
Continue reading
Reports First Amendment
Kaffaga v. Estate of Steinbeck: Copyright and Damages in the Latest Litigation Round over John Steinbeck’s Works

By Inés O’Farrell – Edited by Ryen Bani-Hashemi
Kaffaga v. Estate of Thomas Steinbeck, No. 18-55336, (9th Cir. Sept. 9, 2019). On September 9, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed a decision regarding copyrights over John Steinbeck’s works. The court affirmed a 2018 verdict awarding plaintiff Waverly Scott Kaffaga—executrix of the Estate of Elaine Steinbeck (the author’s wife)—$5.25 million in compensatory damages...
Continue reading
Copyright Reports
United States v. Snowden: DOJ Alleges Snowden Published Classified Information

By Meredith Manda - Edited by Maude Wilson
Complaint, United States v. Snowden, No. 1:19-cv-01197 (E.D. Va. Sept. 17, 2019), complaint hosted by DOJ. The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is suing whistleblower Edward Snowden over his recently published book, Permanent Record. The DOJ alleges that the book may contain classified information and that Snowden failed to submit the book’s manuscript for prepublication review by relevant federal authorities...
Continue reading
Reports First Amendment National Security
PragerU v. YouTube: Does the First Amendment Apply to the Internet’s Public Square?

By Aaron Fogelson – Edited by Sean Lee
Brief of Plaintiff, Prager University v. Google, Inc., No. 17-06064-cv (C.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2017), brief hosted by Browne George Ross LLP. Prager University (“PragerU”) filed a complaint in the US District Court for the Northern District of California claiming that YouTube discriminately censors their content in violation of the First Amendment. PragerU argues that YouTube, despite claiming to...
Continue reading
Reports First Amendment
California State Legislature Passes Five Amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act Before Recess

By Francisco Collantes - Edited by Lilian Zhao
A.B. 25, 2019 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) A.B. 874, 2019 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) A.B. 1146, 2019 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) (exemptions: vehicle information) A.B. 1355, 2019 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) (personal information) A.B. 1564, 2019 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) (consumer privacy: consumer request for disclosure methods) California’s 2019 legislative session wrapped just over...
Continue reading
Reports Privacy
U.S. International Trade Commission Patent Infringement Investigation of Major Filament LED Retailers on Request from the University of California

By Ali Nazari – Edited by Abigail Liles
Filament Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same, USITC Pub. 3401, Inv. No. 337-TA-1172, (Aug. 2019) (pending before the Administrative Law Judge). The United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) initiated an unfair import (Section 337) investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337 against Amazon, Bed Bath & Beyond, IKEA, Target, and Walmart (“the Proposed Respondents”) for alleged Filament LED patent violations...
Continue reading
Reports Patent
Dealing with Profane Trademarks: SCOTUS Considers Hearing Constitutionality of Scandalous Marks Provision

By Andrew Distell - Edited by Oladeji Tiamiyu
Andrei Iancu v. Erik Brunetti, Petitioner’s Brief, hosted by the Supreme Court Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), appealed the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s Ruling in favor of Erik Brunetti to the United States Supreme Court. Petitioner Iancu is represented by United States...
Continue reading
Reports Trademark
Fate of Administrative Patent Judges Hangs in the Balance of Upcoming Federal Circuit Case

By Christian Fernandez-Andes - Edited by Irene Hwang
On April 1, 2019, the United States filed a brief as an appellee-intervenor in the upcoming Federal Circuit case Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co., No. 18-1831 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Polaris had appealed to the Federal Circuit from an adverse decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in an inter partes review proceeding. In its appeal, Polaris...
Continue reading
Reports Patent
Neal v. Fairfax County Police Department: Use of Automatic License Plate Reader Violates Data Privacy Law

By Cathy Wu - Edited by Sam Gilman
RE: Neal v. Fairfax County Police Department, et al., Case No. CL-2015-5902 On April 1, the Virginia circuit court held Fairfax County Police Department’s (“FCPD”) use of the Automatic License Plate Reader (“ALPR”) to be a violation of the state’s Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act, Virginia Code § 2.2-3800 et seq (“Data Act”). The Court granted the plaintiff’s...
Continue reading
Reports Privacy