A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

European Court Finds Liability for Defamatory Comments by Anonymous Users
By Jennifer Garnett – Edited by Elise Young

Delfi AS v. Estonia

The European Court of Human Rights  (“ECHR”) upheld that Delfi, an online news portal, was liable for defamatory user comments.  The ECHR affirmed that Delfi could be liable as a “publisher” and the Estonian courts’ decisions were “justified and proportionate” restrictions under the European Convention on Human Rights. It noted that Delfi must “exercise a degree of caution” in monitoring comments on predictably controversial articles.

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 19 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief
By Elise Young

Apple Prevails on Appeal, Re-Opening Door on Motorola Infringement Case

Bitcoin Is a Currency that May be Regulated Under U.S. Law

Federal Circuit’s Judge Plager Argues that Ambiguous Terms Should Be Construed Against the Drafter

Read More...

Posted On Sep - 3 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

USM Judgment Vacated: Tucker Act Forces Move of Trade Secrets Case to Court of Federal Claims

United States Marine Inc. v. United States
By Jonathan Sapp – Edited by Elise Young

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, transferring a defense contractor’s trade secrets claim to the Court of Federal Claims. In affirming the Fifth Circuit ruling, the court determined that the plaintiff’s case was predicated on a breach of contract claim and relied on the Tucker Act, which gave the Court of Federal Claims exclusive jurisdiction.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 29 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

E-book Conspiracy: Apple’s Agreement with Publishers Violates Antitrust Laws

United States v. Apple
By Elise Young – Edited by Gillian Kassner

On July 10, 2013, the Southern District of New York held that Apple played a central role in a conspiracy among major publishers to “eliminate retail price competition” in the e-book market. The court ruled that Apple was per se liable for violating Section 1 of the Sherman Act, finding “overwhelming evidence that the Publisher Defendants joined with each other in a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy” in which “Apple was a knowing and active member.”

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 21 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
personal-email-invasion-by-feds

DRIP Bill Expands UK

By Yixuan Long – Edited by Insue Kim HL Bill 37 ...

infringement

Federal Circuit Gran

By Kyle Pietari – Edited by Insue Kim VirtualAgility, Inc., v. ...

socket-api-5

Ninth Circuit Reject

By Sheri Pan – Edited by Insue Kim Fox Broadcasting Company, ...

Icon-news

Flash Digest: News i

By Patrick Gutierrez Senate passes bill to make cell phone unlocking ...

Icon-news

Federal Circuit Flas

By Amanda Liverzani Dismissal of Trademark Registration Opposition Affirmed Despite Pronunciation ...