<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/software/zango-inc-v-kaspersky-lab-inc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/software/zango-inc-v-kaspersky-lab-inc</link>
	<description>JOLT Digest offers up-to-date information on current events in law and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:24:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Communications-Law &#187; JOLT Digest » Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. &#124; Harvard Journal ...</title>
		<link>http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/software/zango-inc-v-kaspersky-lab-inc/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Communications-Law &#187; JOLT Digest » Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. &#124; Harvard Journal ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/?p=155#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] JOLT Digest » Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. &#124; Harvard Journal &#8230;&#8230; liability immunity under the Communications Decency Act Sec. 230(c)(2)(B) and rejected Zango&#8217;s argument that Sec. 230 immunity was limited only to Internet content providers. The E-Commerce and Tech Law Blog summarizes the opinion. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JOLT Digest » Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. | Harvard Journal &#8230;&#8230; liability immunity under the Communications Decency Act Sec. 230(c)(2)(B) and rejected Zango&#8217;s argument that Sec. 230 immunity was limited only to Internet content providers. The E-Commerce and Tech Law Blog summarizes the opinion. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
