A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Third Circuit Upholds Online Gambling Ban
By Caitlyn Ross – Edited by Amanda Rice

Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States, No. 08-1981 (3d Cir. Sept. 1, 2009)
Opinion (Hosted by wired.com)

On September 1, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decision, which upheld the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.

Wired.com provides an overview of the case. The Wall Street Journal features an analysis of the decision and its potential effects on online gambling. Additional analysis can be found on ZDnet and Law.com.

The appellate court held that the Act, which bans credit card companies or other institutions from processing payments for unlawful online betting, was not impermissibly vague and did not violate an individual’s privacy rights, the two primary arguments raised by Interactive.

With regard to Interactive’s vagueness argument, the court stated that the law “clearly provides a person of ordinary intelligence with adequate notice of the conduct that it prohibits.” The court also noted that “the Act itself does not make any gambling activity illegal.” Rather, the underlying state law governing gambling determines whether a particular bet is illegal. Accordingly, any vagueness problem is not with the Act, but with the state law governing the application of the Act.

Additionally, the court noted that Interactive’s privacy argument cited Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), and Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. Earle, 517 F.3d 738 (5th Cir. 2008), both of which prohibited forms of sexual conduct between consenting adults in the privacy of their homes. The court found that gambling “simply does not involve any individual interests of the same constitutional magnitude,” so Interactive’s reliance on Lawrence and Earle was misplaced.

The Act and this decision upholding it are undoubtedly blows to Internet gambling sites, which will not be able to receive payment via credit cards.  Nevertheless, many gambling sites already are able to collect payments through other methods.  Additionally, the Wall Street Journal reports that Joe Brennan Jr., chairman of Interactive Media, is hopeful that “language in the decision appearing to place the issue under state jurisdiction” could be “a silver lining,” as it opens the door for state regulation of online gambling.

Posted On Sep - 6 - 2009 Comments Off

Comments are closed.

  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
91ea09a6535666e18ca3c56f731f67ef_400x400

Privacy Concerns in

According to Uber’s Privacy Policy, the (automatically) collected geo-location data ...

free-speech

San Francisco Court

The plaintiff is the owner of the website CoastNews.com. His ...

European union concept, digital illustration.

EU Unitary Patent Sy

The Opinion, the actual text of which is still unavailable, ...

computer-typing1

California Sex Offen

In affirming the district court’s decision, the Court of Appeals ...

nsa-tracking-phone-records-325x337

Congress Fails to Pa

By Henry Thomas – Edited by Paulius Jurcys USA FREEDOM Act ...