A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

By Ken Winterbottom – Edited by Husam El-Qoulaq

Photo By: DouglasCC BY 2.0

The Brazilian Chamber of Deputies passed a bill last week enshrining citizens’ rights to privacy and freedom of expression online. The groundbreaking bill, known as the Marco Civil da Internet, has been called an “Internet Bill of Rights.” The Brazilian Senate will vote on the proposed legislation this month, according to Index on Censorship.

The bill as passed represents a victory for tech juggernauts Google and Facebook, who successfully lobbied for dropping the provision that would have required them to store data collected from Brazilian citizens on servers within Brazilian territory. President Dilma Rousseff, who had been committed to the local storage requirement in the wake of the Edward Snowden NSA leaks, dropped the provision to secure passage of the rest of the bill, Bloomberg reports. Foreign companies storing and managing data on Brazilian citizens are still required to “respect Brazilian law,” but commentators have noted that this provision may be unenforceable in practice for jurisdictional reasons.

The survival of a similarly controversial provision on net neutrality, however, is lauded as a victory for Internet activists. Chapter III, §1 of the Marco Civil da Internet  requires service providers “to treat any data package with isonomy, regardless of content, origin and destination, service, terminal or application.” If this law is enacted, Brazil would become the largest country to have codified such a provision, following the lead of the Netherlands, Chile, and Slovenia.

Also significant is the bill’s provision on intermediary liability, which ensures that “provider[s] of Internet connection will not be civilly liable for damages arising from content generated by third parties.” Service providers may be required by court order to remove content deemed to be offensive, however, and can be penalized for refusal to comply.

Internet activists have expressed concern about the proposed law’s mandatory data retention provision, which requires Internet service providers to store data for at least a year, though this data can only be accessed by court order. InfoJustice summarizes this and other important provisions of the legislation. ArsTechnica and ZDNet provide further discussion.

The international reception of the Marco Civil da Internet has generally been favorable: Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, the man credited with the invention of the World Wide Web, has praised the bill for “balancing the rights and duties of individuals, governments and corporations, while ensuring the Internet continues to be an open and decentralized network,” Reuters reports. Anne Jellema, Chief Executive Officer of the Web Foundation, said: “We congratulate Brazil’s leaders for their courage and vision.”

Posted On Apr - 6 - 2014 6 Comments

6 Responses so far.

  1. [...] providers, however, must respect Brazilian law around freedom of speech and privacy, although it may be difficult or impossible to enforce this for jurisdictional reasons. Lawyer and academic Ronaldo Lemos told the Economist, that renegotiating Brazil’s mutual [...]

  2. [...] providers, however, must respect Brazilian law around freedom of speech and privacy, although it may be difficult or impossible to enforce this for jurisdictional reasons. Lawyer and academic Ronaldo Lemos told the Economist, that renegotiating Brazil’s mutual [...]

  3. [...] While previous regulations like having Brazilians’ data hosted within Brazil were struck down, any business holding Brazilians’ data anywhere in the world is theoretically subject to Brazilian laws around data privacy – although it may be difficult to enforce. [...]

  4. [...] addressing the practical legal problems with enforcing internet rules across borders. For instance, some have pointed out that it may be difficult to enforce regulations such as Brazil’s own data privacy and retention laws to businesses holding [...]

  5. [...] addressing the practical legal problems with enforcing internet rules across borders. For instance, some have pointed out that it may be difficult to enforce regulations such as Brazil’s own data privacy and retention laws to businesses holding [...]

  6. [...] addressing the practical legal problems with enforcing internet rules across borders. For instance, some have pointed out that it may be difficult to enforce regulations such as Brazil’s own data privacy and retention laws to businesses holding [...]

  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
free-speech

Trademark Infringeme

The EFF and the ACLU brief and the potential implications ...

Twitter.png?t=20130219104123

Twitter goes to cour

According to the complaint, the lawsuit was preceded by negotiations ...

samsung-galaxy-phone

Popular Samsung Phon

The ITC also emphasizes that “public interest favors the protection ...

Icon-news

Federal Circuit Flas

By Kathleen McGuinness Two contested patent terms upheld as means-plus-function The United ...

icloud-security-risk-1024x426

Google Faces Potenti

By Amanda Liverzani – Edited by Mengyi Wang Demand Letter to ...