A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

European Court of First Instance rejects Microsoft challenge to European Commission decision

Edited by Johnathan Jenkins

Judgment T-201/04
Full opinion
European Court of First Instance summary and press release

On September 17, the European Court of First Instance rejected Microsoft’s challenge to the European Commission’s 2004 determination that Microsoft “abused a dominant market position” by:

  1. refusing to supply competitors with proprietary “interoperability information” necessary to develop products that would compete with Microsoft workgroup server products, and
  2. bundling Windows Media Player with Windows operating systems, without an unbundling option, between 1999 and 2004.

In its 2004 determination, the Commission imposed a fine of nearly €500 million, which the Court left unchanged. Microsoft may appeal the decision to the European Court of Justice within 60 days.

The court sided with Microsoft on one procedural issue, holding that the Commission exceeded its authority in requiring Microsoft to appoint a monitoring trustee with powers independent of the Commission at the company’s own expense. Microsoft itself acknowledged, however, that the trustee issue was relatively unimportant.

BBC News summarizes the decision.
Microsoft issued a statement shortly after the decision was issued.
The EU Law Blog comments on the trustee issue.

Posted On Sep - 17 - 2007 Comments Off

Comments are closed.

  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
books

Creating full-text s

Judge Parker went on to explain that copyright is “not ...

Hacked By Over-X

European Union Court

Proceedings began when the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) brought a ...

Photo By: André Natta - CC BY 2.0

Georgia Supreme Cour

In 2013, Ellis filed a request claiming that Chan was ...

Icon-news

Federal Circuit Flas

By Kellen Wittkop Appeal of a contempt order for violation of ...

invisalign-braces

ITC’s review of an

On appeal, the Federal Circuit first stated that the “arbitrary, ...