A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Supreme Court’ Category

by Vivian Tao House Passes Patent Reform Bill; Senate and House Versions To Be Reconciled A few months after the American Invents Act had passed in the Senate, the House voted to pass its version of the bill this week. The controversial bill would overhaul certain areas of the patent system, such as switching from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system. However, according to Patent Docs, the ACLU and other groups are more concerned that passage of the bill could ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 27 - 2011 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Supreme Court Holds Bayh-Dole Act Does Not Independently Vest Ownership to Federally Funded Contractors By Daniel Robinson – Edited by Esther Kang Bd. of Tr. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 563 U.S. ____ (June 6, 2011) Slip Opinion (via supremecourt.gov) The Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit, which had held that the Bayh-Dole Act did not void an inventor’s assignment of intellectual property rights to a company. The Court held in a 7-2 decision that ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 16 - 2011 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Supreme Court Affirms Clear and Convincing Standard for Patent Invalidity Defenses By Samantha Kuhn – Edited by Esther Kang Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. P’ship, No. 10–290 (U.S. June 9, 2011) Slip Opinion (via supremecourt.gov) On June 9, the Supreme Court affirmed a district court’s jury instructions requiring that the evidence of patent invalidity be “clear and convincing” for the invalidity defense against infringement to be successful. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that the presumption of validity ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 15 - 2011 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Supreme Court Adopts “Willful Blindness” Standard for Induced Infringement By Raquel Acosta – Edited by Matt Gelfand Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A., 563 U. S. ____ (May 31, 2011) Slip Opinion The Supreme Court affirms the result but not the “deliberate indifference” standard used by the Federal Circuit. In an 8-1 decision the Supreme Court held that, under 35 U. S. C. § 271(b), inducement of infringement requires that a defendant have knowledge that the acts they induced ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 10 - 2011 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Microsoft argues for a lower burden of proof for patent invalidity where prior art wasn’t before the PTO By Abby Lauer – Edited by Matt Gelfand Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. P’ship, No. 10-290 (U.S. 2011) Transcript of Oral Arguments On April 18, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. P’ship, a case involving a dispute over the evidentiary standard that must be met by a patent challenger in order to overcome the presumption ... Read More...
Posted On Apr - 22 - 2011 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Newegg

Newegg Wins Patent T

By Kasey Wang – Edited by Yunnan Jiang and Travis ...

Photo By: Brian Hawkins - CC BY 2.0

The Evolution of Int

[caption id="attachment_4164" align="alignleft" width="300"] Photo By: Brian Hawkins - CC ...

images

The Global Corporate

By Kate Westmoreland Edited by Yunnan Jiang 1.     Introduction Accessing online records and ...

technology-512210_1280

Legal Issues in Comp

By Deborah Beth Medows, Symposium Editor When this author first conceived ...

Microsoft Mobile

A Victory for Compat

By Stacy Ruegilin – Edited by Ken Winterbottom Microsoft Corp. v. ...