A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Garmin Prevails in First Inter Partes Patent Review
By James Grace – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), in its first inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. 311, held in favor of Garmin, a GPS technology developer. PTAB cancelled three claims of a speed limit indicator patent held by Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC, finding it obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103. Cuozzo’s Motion to Amend the patent to substitute the three impugned claims was denied.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 19 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By James Grace

Hershey’s Opposes Mars’ Attempt to Register a Snickers’ Cross-Section as a Design Mark

Medtronic v. Boston Scientific – Oral Argument

Proposed Tweak to Law Would Pull Shield From Generic-Drug Makers

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 10 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Christopher A. Crawford

DOJ Notifies Defendant: Evidence Gained From Warrantless Wiretaps

New Smartphone Patent War Begins

FTC Asks For Comments Regarding Regulation Of The “Internet of Things”

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 5 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Innovation Act of 2013 – Latest Effort to Disarm Patent Trolls
By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

H.R. 3309 – Innovation Act

The perceived “patent troll” problem has plagued the U.S. patent system for years. To curb abusive patent litigation, Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), with a bipartisan coalition, introduced the “Innovation Act” in the House of Representatives on Oct 23, 2013. The patent reform bill contains a number of provisions that seek to change the landscape of patent procurement, ownership, and enforcement.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 3 - 2013 5 Comments READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Finds Means–Plus–Function Algorithm Claim Invalid for Indefiniteness
By Aditya Gupta – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

Ibormeith IP, LLC v Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

The Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s holding that certain means-plus-function claims of Ibormeith’s patent -  “Sleepiness Detection for Vehicle Driver or Machine Operator” – were invalid for indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The court also noted that Ibormeith’s arguments for the breadth of its disclosure, for the purpose of infringement, must be held as “binding admissions” when evaluating claim validity.

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 30 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
91ea09a6535666e18ca3c56f731f67ef_400x400

Privacy Concerns in

By Sabreena Khalid – Edited by Insue Kim Following scandals earlier ...

free-speech

San Francisco Court

By Jens Frankenreiter – Edited by Henry Thomas S. Louis Martin ...

European union concept, digital illustration.

EU Unitary Patent Sy

By Saukshmya Trichi – Edited by Ashish Bakshi Advocate General’s Opinion ...

computer-typing1

California Sex Offen

By Jesse Goodwin – Edited by Michael Shammas Doe v. Harris, ...

nsa-tracking-phone-records-325x337

Congress Fails to Pa

By Henry Thomas – Edited by Paulius Jurcys USA FREEDOM Act ...