A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Kellen Wittkop

Dismissal of Suit for Violation of False Marketing Affirmed Due to Lack of Standing after Elimination of qui tam Provision

Summary Judgment Affirmed for Subject Matter Ineligibility of Claims for Infringement of “Device Profile” Generation and Use

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

USPTO’s post-Alice guidance on patenting claims involving abstract ideas.
By Max Kwon – Edited by Sarah O’Loughlin

In response to Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the USPTO issued a memorandum stating that it will now require that all claims involving abstract ideas for subject matter eligibility be analyzed under the framework outlined in  Mayo Collaborative Services. Although this approach adopts a single analysis, it remains to be seen whether the test will provide enough guidance to both patentees and courts for determining what qualifies as a patentable claim involving an abstract idea.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 7 - 2014 2 Comments READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief 

By Amanda Liverzani

Non-Infringement Decision on Hospital Bed Patents Reversed for Erroneous Claim Construction

Patents for Eyelash Growth Treatment Invalidated Based on Obviousness

Constitutionality of “First-Inventor-to-File” Regime Still Undecided

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 6 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Anne Woodworth

Federal Circuit finds No Standing in Case Challenging First-to-File Patent Regime

Argentina becomes the First Latin American Country to Block The Pirate Bay

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Google Appeal in Street View Case

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 6 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Fate of Software Patents Still Unclear Following SCOTUS Decision in Alice v. CLS Bank

By Amanda Liverzani Edited by Insue Kim

Intellectual property practitioners and technology companies anxiously awaiting clarification on the patentability of software will find little guidance in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alice. In the highly anticipated decision, the Court declined to articulate a definitive test for when software may be patented, instead relying on the precedent established in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories Inc., 566 U.S. ____ (2012) and Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010) to invalidate the software patents at issue.

Read More...

Posted On Jun - 28 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Television

District Court Holds

By Anne Woodworth – Edited by Henry Thomas Order: Fox Television ...

Neiman Marcus

Data Breach Victims,

By Brittany Doyle – Edited by Ariane Moss Remijas v. Neiman ...

Magnifying Glass

How Far Can Law Enfo

By Kasey Wang – Edited by Ariane Moss State v. Rindfleisch, ...

Russia & China Cropped

Russia’s “Right

By Brittany Doyle - Edited by Ken Winterbottom The legislatures in ...

Avvo Logo Cropped

Washington Appeals C

By Leonidas Angelakos – Edited by Olga Slobodyanyuk Thomson v. Doe, ...