A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Massive Patent Verdict Overturned By Jia Ryu – Edited by Stephanie Young Uniloc v. Microsoft, No. 03-440 S (D. R.I. Sept. 29, 2009) Opinion The United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island vacated one of the largest patent verdicts in history, in which a jury held that Microsoft’s “Product Activation System” (“PA”) infringed on Uniloc’s patented “System for Software Registration” (the “‘216 patent”). In holding that Microsoft did not infringe as a matter of law, the District ... Read More...
Posted On Oct - 9 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Public Accessibility Prior to Patent By Stuart K. Tubis – Edited by Caity Ross In re Lister, No. 2009-1060 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 22, 2009) Slip Op. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, siding with Dr. Lister, vacated and remanded the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision, which had affirmed an examiner’s rejection of Dr. Lister’s patent application under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The Federal Circuit held that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences erred ... Read More...
Posted On Oct - 6 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
The Federal Circuit Provides Protection to Medical Diagnostics By Brittany Blueitt – Edited by Caity Ross Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., Case No. 2008-1403 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2009) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) reversed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patents 6,355,623 (“the ’623 patent”) and 6,680,302 (“the ’302 patent”) under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ... Read More...
Posted On Oct - 3 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova Inc. By Debbie Rosenbaum – Edited by Stephanie Young Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova Inc., 2008-1459, -1476 (CAFC Sept. 3, 2009) Opinion On September 3, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware’s jury verdict finding that Martek’s patents were valid and infringed, but reversed the points of error Martek asserted on cross appeal. The Federal Circuit (“CAFC”), sitting as an expanded five-member panel: 1) ... Read More...
Posted On Sep - 12 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Federal Circuit Overturns Earlier Decision and Holds No Liability for Exporting Components of Method Patents By Evan Kubota – Edited by Sarah Sorscher Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2007-1296, -1347 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2009) Slip Opinion On August 19, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, held that 35 U.S.C. § 271(f), a statute providing for liability for exporting components of patented inventions, does not apply to method patents. The ruling overturned ... Read More...
Posted On Aug - 27 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
unlock_cell_phone

The Court of Justice

By Ann Kristin Glenster - Edited by David Nathaniel Tan Introduction On October 6, ...

Fed. Cir. Flash Digest

Flash Digest: News i

By Yiran Zhang – Edited by Olga Slobodyanyuk Senators Introduce a ...

Icon-news

Flash Digest: News i

By David Nathaniel Tan - Edited by Adi Kamdar Software Pirate ...

1271084_10152203108461729_809245696_o

Belgian Court Demand

By Mila Owen – Edited by Kayla Haran Belgian Privacy Commission ...

Sikhs for Justice Logo

Facebook not liable

By Ann Kristin Glenster – Edited by Yaping Zhang Sikhs for ...