A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Federal Circuit Finds No Federal Jurisdiction Over Patent Claim By Debbie Rosenbaum – Edited by Caitlyn Ross  Larson v. Correct Craft, June 5, 2009 No. 2008-1208 Opinion hosted by The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit On June 5, the Federal Circuit vacated the judgment of the district court in Larson v. Correct Craft and remanded with instructions to transfer the case back to state court based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).  ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 14 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
By Tyler Lacey Federal Prosecutors Launch New Attack Against Online Gamblers in the United States On June 9, the New York Times reported that federal prosecutors asked four American banks to freeze accounts containing money believed to be used for distributing winnings to online poker players. Wells Fargo, one of the contacted banks, received a court order requiring that the funds be frozen. Professor I. Nelson Rose of Whittier Law School described the move as “surprising” and as a “gamble” ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 13 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
By Aaron Dulles – Edited by Stephanie Weiner Epistar Corp. v. International Trade Commission, May 22 2009, No. 2007-1427 (slip opinion) (hosted by PatentlyO) On May 22, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded an ITC decision in Philips Lumileds Lighting Company (Lumileds)’s infringement action against Epistar and the United Epitaxy Company (UEC). The ITC had held that Epistar infringed Lumileds’s US Patent no. 5,008,718, concerning certain types of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and issued a Limited ... Read More...
Posted On Jun - 1 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
By Brian Kozlowski Lawsuit Against Brooks Brothers for Falsely Marketing Ties Dismissed The 271 Patent Blog reports that on May 14, a district court granted Brooks Brothers’ motion to dismiss an action for false marketing. Pro se plaintiff Raymond Stauffer sued Brooks Brothers under section 292 of the Patent Act, which allows damages of “not more than $500″ for each false claim that unpatented items are protected by patent. Under the Act, damages are split between the plaintiff and the ... Read More...
Posted On May - 31 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
Federal Circuit Resolves Split Regarding Product-by-Process Claims By Sharona Hakimi – Edited by Stephanie Weiner Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc., May 18, 2009, No. 07-1400, -1406 Opinion (hosted by Patently-O) On May 18th the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, reconciled a long-standing conflict between two lines of cases determining the scope of product-by-process claims. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp. rule that infringement of a product-by-process claim requires actually using ... Read More...
Posted On May - 30 - 2009 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Unknown

Flash Digest: News i

By Anne Woodworth UK Court Allows Safari Users to Sue Google ...

e222580_includeB

Federal Circuit Reje

By Paulius Jurcys – Yaping Zhang Order: Halo Electronics, Inc. v. ...

600px-NetNeutrality_logo.svg_

The FCC’s Net Neut

By Shuli Wang - Edited by Yaping Zhang THE FCC 15-24 ...

13399-surveillance_news

White House releases

By Lan Du – Edited by Katherine Kwong Administration Discussion Draft: ...

Unknown

Federal Circuit Flas

By Patrick Gallagher Federal Circuit Affirms Denial of AT&T Motion to ...