A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Supreme Court Weighs Patent Eligibility of Software
By Mary Schnoor — Edited by Elise Young

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, a case with the potential to determine whether, or when, computer-implemented inventions (i.e., software) are patent-eligible subject matter. Many commentators hope the Court will use this case as an opportunity to clarify what makes an invention an “abstract idea” that is ineligible for patenting.

Read More...

Posted On Apr - 10 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Corey Omer

Apple v. Samsung — Round 2

Block v. eBay — Misinterpreting Terms of Service

GrubHub Goes Public

Tweet Away, Turkey

Read More...

Posted On Apr - 7 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Overturns Vederi v. Google — Google’s “Street View” Might Have Infringed Vederi’s Asserted Patents
By Jenny Choi – Edited by Ashish Bakshi

On March 14, 2014, the Federal Circuit reversed and vacated the United States District Court for the Central District of California’s decision entering summary judgment in favor of Google, Inc. The Federal Circuit held that “substantially elevation” covered both flat and spherical images, noting that it preferred claim construction based on intrinsic evidence and interpretation that “gives meaning to all the terms of the claim.”

Read More...

Posted On Mar - 25 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Limits the ITC’s Authority to Address Post-Importation Induced Infringement
By Mary Schnoor  – Edited by Mengyi Wang

In Suprema v. ITC, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the ITC’s finding of induced infringement of a method patent when direct infringement occurred only after the imported product, a fingerprint scanner, was combined with software by a customer within the United States. The Federal Circuit concluded that the ITC’s authority to block “articles that . . . infringe” only applies when the articles being barred directly infringe a U.S. patent at the time of importation.

Read More...

Posted On Mar - 18 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Written Description Problems of the Monoclonal Antibody Patents after Centocor v. Abbott 

Written By: Hyeongsu Park - Edited By: Kendra Albert

The market for therapeutic antibodies is projected to reach hundreds of billion dollars within the next several years. In Centocor v. Abbott, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) held that a patentee cannot claim an antibody unless the specification describes it, even if he/she fully characterizes the antigen, and the court vacated a $1.67 billion jury verdict, the largest patent infringement award in U.S. history.

Read More...

Posted On Mar - 13 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Icon-news

Flash Digest: News i

By Olga Slobodyanyuk ICANN responds to terrorism victims by claiming domain ...

color_profiling1-309884_203x203

Federal Circuit Appl

By Amanda Liverzani – Edited by Mengyi Wang Digitech Image Technologies, ...

unlock_cell_phone

Unlocking Cell Phone

By Kellen Wittkop – Edited by Insue Kim On July 25, ...

gmailopenlock_zpsa33107c7

SDNY Magistrate Gran

By Kellen Wittkop – Edited by Travis West In the Matter ...

books

Creating full-text s

Creating full-text searchable database of copyrighted works is “fair use” By ...