A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Federal Circuit Invalidates Patent for Advertisement-Based Access to Online Content

By Amanda Liverzani – Edited by Yunnan Jiang

Applying the Supreme Court’s recent Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank decision that clarified the abstract idea exception to subject matter patent-eligibility, the Federal Circuit invalidated a patent for a method of accessing online content after viewing advertisements in Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 30 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Ken Winterbottom

Motion to Dismiss in Hulu Patent Infringement Suit Affirmed

“Virtual Classroom” Patent Infringement Case Remanded for Further Determination

Attorney Publicly Reprimanded for Circulating Email from Judge

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 19 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Tightens Patent Standing Requirement in Azure Networks

By Kathleen McGuinness – Edited by Sabreena Khalid

In Azure Networks, LLC v. CSR PLC, the Federal Circuit ruled that patent owners who had licensed “all substantial rights” to a third party could not be joined as plaintiffs in a suit on that patent. The court also reaffirmed the high bar to proving that a patentee has redefined a well-understood technical term.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 18 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News In Brief 

By: Yunnan Jiang

Federal Circuit denies appeal in Baraclude patent case

Federal Circuit denies fee-shifting sanction in patent infringement action over Pfizer

Federal Circuit rejects patent infringement for products sold oversees

 

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 12 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Rules Harvard Oncomouse Patent Expired 

By Michelle Goldring – Edited by Paulius Jurcys

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which had granted summary judgment to the Patent and Trademark Office. On de novo review, the Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s finding that Harvard’s third patent on a gene sequence used to make research animals more susceptible to cancer had expired and was not eligible for new claims under 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(j).

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 11 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Newegg

Newegg Wins Patent T

By Kasey Wang – Edited by Yunnan Jiang and Travis ...

Photo By: Brian Hawkins - CC BY 2.0

The Evolution of Int

[caption id="attachment_4164" align="alignleft" width="300"] Photo By: Brian Hawkins - CC ...

images

The Global Corporate

By Kate Westmoreland Edited by Yunnan Jiang 1.     Introduction Accessing online records and ...

technology-512210_1280

Legal Issues in Comp

By Deborah Beth Medows, Symposium Editor When this author first conceived ...

Microsoft Mobile

A Victory for Compat

By Stacy Ruegilin – Edited by Ken Winterbottom Microsoft Corp. v. ...