A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Expert Testimony May Be Required to Determine if Patent Specification Adequately Supports Means-Plus-Function Claim
By Geng Chen – Edited by Ashish Bakshi

The Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s finding that the system claims in elcommerce’s patent were invalid. The court held that, in order to properly determine if a specification adequately supported a means-plus-function claim, a district court may require expert testimony so that the specification can be understood from the perspective of a person with ordinary skill in the art.


Posted On Mar - 2 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Foreseeability Does Not Preclude Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents
By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Elise Young

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington’s grant of summary judgment, finding that Ring & Pinion Service Inc.’s (“R&P”) Ziplocker product did not infringe ARB Corporation Ltd.’s (“ARB”) U.S. Patent No. 5,591,098 (“the ’098 patent”). Ring & Pinion Service Inc., slip op. at 2.


Posted On Feb - 27 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of Inurement Doctrine; Implicit Direction Sufficient
By Elise Young – Edited by Geng Chen

The Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidity of Solvay’s patent. The court ruled that inurement does not require the inventors to direct reduction to practice, but that authorization is sufficient. As such, Honeywell’s reduction to practice in the United States inured to the original foreign inventors because their agreement implicitly authorized reduction to practice.


Posted On Feb - 19 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Amy Zhang

Samsung Sues Dyson for Damages to Its Reputation

Maker of Candy Crush Saga Files for an IPO

AT&T Releases First Transparency Report


Posted On Feb - 18 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Innovation Act Receives Support from Intellectual Property Professors; Education Organizations Express Reservations
By Aditya Gupta – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

The Innovation Act recently received support from sixty professors teaching IP law at universities across the U.S. in a letter to Congress, citing “abusive” patent trolls and their impact on small companies and large manufacturers. In contrast, a group of six major education organizations previously issued two statements raising concerns over the draft of the Act and claiming that it raises a “specter of unintended problems.”


Posted On Dec - 18 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Fed. Cir. Flash Digest

Federal Circuit Flas

By Kayla Haran – Edited by Ken Winterbottom Court Finds Negative ...

Fed. Cir. Flash Digest

Federal Circuit Flas

By Patrick Gallagher – Edited by Ken Winterbottom TOR Project Head ...


Senate passes Cybers

Senate passes Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act By Frederick Ding — Edited by ...

Senate Judiciary Committee

Senators push bill p

By Bhargav Srinivasan – Edited by Olga Slobodyanyuk In October, Senators ...


Federal Circuit Flas

Federal Circuit Flash Digest By Keke Wu – Edited by Yunnan ...