A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Foreseeability Does Not Preclude Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents
By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Elise Young

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington’s grant of summary judgment, finding that Ring & Pinion Service Inc.’s (“R&P”) Ziplocker product did not infringe ARB Corporation Ltd.’s (“ARB”) U.S. Patent No. 5,591,098 (“the ’098 patent”). Ring & Pinion Service Inc., slip op. at 2.


Posted On Feb - 27 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of Inurement Doctrine; Implicit Direction Sufficient
By Elise Young – Edited by Geng Chen

The Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidity of Solvay’s patent. The court ruled that inurement does not require the inventors to direct reduction to practice, but that authorization is sufficient. As such, Honeywell’s reduction to practice in the United States inured to the original foreign inventors because their agreement implicitly authorized reduction to practice.


Posted On Feb - 19 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Amy Zhang

Samsung Sues Dyson for Damages to Its Reputation

Maker of Candy Crush Saga Files for an IPO

AT&T Releases First Transparency Report


Posted On Feb - 18 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Innovation Act Receives Support from Intellectual Property Professors; Education Organizations Express Reservations
By Aditya Gupta – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

The Innovation Act recently received support from sixty professors teaching IP law at universities across the U.S. in a letter to Congress, citing “abusive” patent trolls and their impact on small companies and large manufacturers. In contrast, a group of six major education organizations previously issued two statements raising concerns over the draft of the Act and claiming that it raises a “specter of unintended problems.”


Posted On Dec - 18 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Court Punts Apple v. Samsung Back to Judge Koh, Citing Overly Restrictive Causal Nexus Standard

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.
By Amy Zhang – Edited by Elise Young

On November 18th, the Federal Circuit ruled on the Northern District Court of California’s decision, which denied Apple’s request for a permanent injunction. It affirmed the finding that Samsung did not infringe Apple’s design patents but vacated the denial of injunctive relief for utility patents. The decision turns on the the causal nexus between ongoing infringement and irreparable harm.


Posted On Nov - 24 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay

Patenting Bioprintin

By Jasper L. Tran – Edited by Henry Thomas “Patenting tends to ...


More than a White Ra

By Allison E. Butler – Edited by Travis West I. Introduction On ...

Prescription Medication Spilling From an Open Medicine Bottle

Legal and Policy Asp

By Ariella Michal Medows – Edited by Kenneth Winterbottom The United ...

Photo By: Razor512 - CC BY 2.0

Net Neutrality Devel

By Angela Daly – Edited by Katherine Zimmerman 1.      Introduction This contribution will ...


Newegg Wins Patent T

By Kasey Wang – Edited by Yunnan Jiang and Travis ...