A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Supreme Court Denies Nokia Relief from ITC Import Ban
By James Grace – Edited by Ashish Bakshi

Interdigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n

The Supreme Court denied Nokia’s petition for a writ of certiorari, upholding the Federal Circuit’s finding that Nokia had violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing into the U.S. cell phones that violated two U.S. patents owned by InterDigital. In denying the petition without comment, the Supreme Court did not address whether “licensing alone” could satisfy the “domestic industry” requirement of Section 337.

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 26 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Affirms Inequitable Conduct Based on False Declaration
By Mary Schnoor – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corp.

The Federal Circuit affirmed that two patents owned by Intellect Wireless, Inc. (“Intellect”) are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. Intellect claimed that HTC Corp. had infringed patents covering technology allowing a wireless device to receive and display caller identification information. The founder of Intellect, and inventor of the patents in question, intentionally submitted false declarations to the USPTO.

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 22 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Mengyi Wang

Protecting Dwindling Elephant Populations in Kenya: Google Earth, Drones, and Legislation

California Governor Vetoes State Electronic Privacy Bill

SeaChange Prevails in ARRIS Patent Dispute

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 21 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Obama Administration Vetoes ITC Ban on Sale and Import of Older Apple Products
By Simon Heimowitz – Edited by Kathleen McGuinness

The Obama administration vetoed an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) exclusion order that had effectively banned the importation of some older models of the iPhone and iPad. The ITC issued the order after finding that Apple had infringed one of Samsung’s standard-essential patents. The US Trade Representative noted that the veto was made after taking into account the “effect on competitive conditions in the U.S. economy and the effect on U.S. consumers.”

Read More...

Posted On Sep - 14 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief
By Elise Young

Apple Prevails on Appeal, Re-Opening Door on Motorola Infringement Case

Bitcoin Is a Currency that May be Regulated Under U.S. Law

Federal Circuit’s Judge Plager Argues that Ambiguous Terms Should Be Construed Against the Drafter

Read More...

Posted On Sep - 3 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
91ea09a6535666e18ca3c56f731f67ef_400x400

Privacy Concerns in

By Sabreena Khalid – Edited by Insue Kim Following scandals earlier ...

free-speech

San Francisco Court

By Jens Frankenreiter – Edited by Henry Thomas S. Louis Martin ...

European union concept, digital illustration.

EU Unitary Patent Sy

By Saukshmya Trichi – Edited by Ashish Bakshi Advocate General’s Opinion ...

computer-typing1

California Sex Offen

By Jesse Goodwin – Edited by Michael Shammas Doe v. Harris, ...

nsa-tracking-phone-records-325x337

Congress Fails to Pa

By Henry Thomas – Edited by Paulius Jurcys USA FREEDOM Act ...