A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

U.S. District Court Denied TC Heartland’s Writ of Mandamus to Transfer Patent Infringement Suit

 

In April 2016, the Federal Circuit denied TC Heartland LLC’s writ of mandamus. Hartland requested the court order the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware to dismiss or transfer the patent infringement suit initiated by Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC. In rejecting Hartland’s request, the court explained that a writ of mandamus is an “extraordinary remedy appropriate only in exceptional circumstances” and Hartland did not meet this bar.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 25 - 2016 Add Comments READ FULL POST

The Federal Circuit, in the closely divided en banc decision of SCA v. First Quality, held that Congress had authorized laches as a defense against legal remedy for patent infringement. This contradicts the Supreme Court’s recent holding that for copyright law, laches only applies to legal remedy when Congress hasn’t established a statute of limitations. The Supreme Court has granted cert to review the Federal Circuit’s holding.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 17 - 2016 Add Comments READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest

 

By Frederick Ding — Edited by Jaehwan Park

 

Patent Assertion Entity Not a “Patentee” By Itself

 

Induced Infringement Verdict Not Defeated by Defendant’s Unreasonable Belief in Noninfringement

 

Continuations Can Be Filed on Same Day as Earlier Application’s Issuance

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2016 Add Comments READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Daniel Etcovitch – Edited by Henry Thomas

Google Seeks Sanctions Against Oracle’s Attorney in Copyright Case

EU Parliament Passes Law Requiring Removal of Online Terrorist Content

9th Circuit Rules CFAA Applies to Password-Sharing

Apple Granted Patent Over Infrared System That Could Shut Down Cameras

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2016 Add Comments READ FULL POST

Supreme Court rejected the rigid Seagate two-part test for enhanced damages, which requires finding objective recklessness, and held that district courts have discretion to award enhanced damages according to circumstances of the case.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2016 Add Comments READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Unknown

Flash Digest: News i

By Jaehwan Park - Edited by Kayla Haran Bipartisan Lawmakers Introduce ...

13399-surveillance_news

Second Circuit Prohi

By Filippo Raso – Edited by Shailin Thomas Microsoft v. US, ...

infringement

U.S. District Court

By Emily Chan – Edited by Evan Tallmadge In re TC ...

Senate

Congresswoman Speier

By Priyanka Nawathe – Edited by Henry Thomas H. R. Bill ...

Photo By: Robert Scoble - CC BY 2.0

Oracle Renews Motion

[caption id="attachment_3907" align="alignleft" width="175"] Photo By: Robert Scoble - CC ...