A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Jurisdiction’ Category

Expert Testimony May Be Required to Determine if Patent Specification Adequately Supports Means-Plus-Function Claim
By Geng Chen – Edited by Ashish Bakshi

The Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s finding that the system claims in elcommerce’s patent were invalid. The court held that, in order to properly determine if a specification adequately supported a means-plus-function claim, a district court may require expert testimony so that the specification can be understood from the perspective of a person with ordinary skill in the art.

Read More...

Posted On Mar - 2 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Foreseeability Does Not Preclude Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents
By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Elise Young

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington’s grant of summary judgment, finding that Ring & Pinion Service Inc.’s (“R&P”) Ziplocker product did not infringe ARB Corporation Ltd.’s (“ARB”) U.S. Patent No. 5,591,098 (“the ’098 patent”). Ring & Pinion Service Inc., slip op. at 2.

Read More...

Posted On Feb - 27 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of Inurement Doctrine; Implicit Direction Sufficient
By Elise Young – Edited by Geng Chen

The Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidity of Solvay’s patent. The court ruled that inurement does not require the inventors to direct reduction to practice, but that authorization is sufficient. As such, Honeywell’s reduction to practice in the United States inured to the original foreign inventors because their agreement implicitly authorized reduction to practice.

Read More...

Posted On Feb - 19 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Wordpress Sues DMCA Takedown Abusers

Automattic Inc. & Hotham v. Steiner
Automattic Inc. & Retraction Watch, LLC v. Chatwal
By Elise Young – Edited by Alex Shank

Automattic, owner of WordPress.com and a major developer of the WordPress software, has sued two parties for abusing the notice-and-takedown provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) and seeks damages under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f). Automattic’s decision to go after parties that use fraudulent copyright takedown notices could mark a shift in how content hosts handle DMCA takedown requests.

Read More...

Posted On Dec - 6 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Hacktivist Jeremy Hammond Sentenced to Ten Years in Prison
By Mark Verstraete – Edited by Thuy Nguyen

On Friday, November 15, 2013, Anonymous affiliated hacktivist Jeremy Hammond was sentenced to ten years in prison and three years of supervised release. Hammon was sentenced under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for hacking Texas-based private intelligence firm, Strategic Forecasting. During his supervised release period, Hammond is proscribed from using computer anonymity devices, such as Tor.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 26 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
91ea09a6535666e18ca3c56f731f67ef_400x400

Privacy Concerns in

By Sabreena Khalid – Edited by Insue Kim Following scandals earlier ...

free-speech

San Francisco Court

By Jens Frankenreiter – Edited by Henry Thomas S. Louis Martin ...

European union concept, digital illustration.

EU Unitary Patent Sy

By Saukshmya Trichi – Edited by Ashish Bakshi Advocate General’s Opinion ...

computer-typing1

California Sex Offen

By Jesse Goodwin – Edited by Michael Shammas Doe v. Harris, ...

nsa-tracking-phone-records-325x337

Congress Fails to Pa

By Henry Thomas – Edited by Paulius Jurcys USA FREEDOM Act ...