A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘International Decisions’ Category

Class Action Suits Filed Against Mt. Gox in the United States and Canada
By Mark Verstraete — Edited by Sarah O’Loughlin

Putative class action suits have been filed against Mt. Gox—the now defunct online bitcoin exchange—in both the United States and Canada. In Febrauary 2014, Mt. Gox halted withdrawals after being hit with a sustained distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack. Several days later, it filed for bankruptcy when 850,000 bitcoins were stolen.

Read More...

Posted On Mar - 24 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

U.K. High Court finds that Zynga’s Scramble does not infringe on Mattel’s trademarked Scrabble
By Michelle Goldring – Edited by Jennifer Wong

J.W. Spear & Sons v. Zynga Inc.

The England and Wales High Court of Justice, Chancery Division held that infringement of Scrabble’s trademarked name did not occur when Zynga titled its games “Scramble” and “Scramble with Friends.” It also held that the word “Scramble” was used to refer to games of that type and therefore did not infringe on Mattel’s trademark of that word. However, the court also expressed concern that the “Scramble” logo created a likelihood of confusion because of its design.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 13 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

European Court Finds Liability for Defamatory Comments by Anonymous Users
By Jennifer Garnett – Edited by Elise Young

Delfi AS v. Estonia

The European Court of Human Rights  (“ECHR”) upheld that Delfi, an online news portal, was liable for defamatory user comments.  The ECHR affirmed that Delfi could be liable as a “publisher” and the Estonian courts’ decisions were “justified and proportionate” restrictions under the European Convention on Human Rights. It noted that Delfi must “exercise a degree of caution” in monitoring comments on predictably controversial articles.

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 19 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Britain’s Court of Appeal Rejects Cadbury’s Trademark Application for Color Purple
By Anton Ziajka – Edited by Abhilasha Nautiyal

Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. Cadbury UK Ltd.

The Britain Court of Appeals held that Cadbury’s purple color mark did not qualify as a trade mark under the Trade Marks Directive of 2008, since the impugned mark did not constitute “a sign” that is “graphically represented.” To allow registration of the trademark with such vagueness, the Court noted, would offend both “the principle[s] of certainty…[and] of fairness.”

Read More...

Posted On Oct - 11 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Injunction Imposed in Volkswagen Car Hacking Case: Public Safety Favored Over Transparency
By Jonathan Sapp – Edited by Alex Shank

A British high court enjoined Flavio Garcia from publishing an academic paper that sought to expose weaknesses in Volkswagen’s automobile security systems. In the paper, Garcia revealed secret codes used to activate the ignition systems of several luxury vehicles. The court’s ruling is the latest in the battle against researchers using hacking to expose security systems’ flaws.

Read More...

Posted On Aug - 10 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Unknown

Insuring Patents

By Yaping Zhang Edited by Jennifer Chung and Ariel Simms Despite its ...

Senate Judiciary Committee

Defend Trade Secrets

By Suyoung Jang – Edited by Mila Owen S.1890 - Defend ...

Flash Digest

Federal Circuit Flas

By Evan Tallmadge – Edited by Olga Slobodyanyuk The Linked Inheritability ...

Illinois Flag

Amicus Brief by EFF

By Yaping Zhang – Edited by Mila Owen On April 6, ...

Fed. Cir. Flash Digest

Flash Digest: News i

By Gia Velasquez – Edited by Ken Winterbottom Federal Court Grants ...