A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Federal Circuit Decisions’ Category

Routine High-Throughput Screening is Undue Experimentation, Federal Circuit Holds

Wyeth v. Abbott Labs
By Kathleen McGuinness – Edited by Alex Shank

The Federal Circuit upheld the invalidity of patents claiming the use of rapamycin to treat restenosis, the renarrowing of an artery following angioplasty. The court held that “routine experimentation” to discover species of compounds within a claimed genus could constitute “undue experimentation,” since the discovery may require screening tens of thousands of compounds without any guidance from the patent.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 5 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief
By Alex Shank

Federal Circuit Holds that Good-Faith Belief in Invalidity May Disprove Intent to Induce Infringement

Pandora Contends that Michigan Privacy Law Does Not Apply to Streamed Music

Chinese Wind Turbine Company Indicted on Misappropriation of U.S. Company’s Trade Secrets

Read More...

Posted On Jun - 29 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News in Brief
By Kathleen McGuinness

Google News Becomes Opt-In in Germany

Federal Circuit Rules that Software Patent Is Not an “Abstract Idea”

Tokyo Court Rules for Apple, Against Samsung in Bounce-Back Patent Dispute

Read More...

Posted On Jun - 22 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Court Dismisses Monsanto Case

Organic Seed Growers v. Monsanto
By Kathleen McGuinness – Edited by Jennifer Wong

The Federal Circuit dismissed a declaratory judgment action against Monsanto for lack of jurisdiction. Monsanto’s assurances constituted a legally binding disclaimer not to sue in cases of inadvertent contamination by their patented seeds. Since the plaintiffs had not removed themselves from the disclaimer’s protection, any “case or controversy” was moot.

Read More...

Posted On Jun - 20 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Burdens of Discovery for Scientific Working Materials and Deliberative Documents

Written by: Evelyn Y. Chang
Edited by: Jessica Vosgerchian

In March of 2012, British Petroleum sought court enforcement of a subpoena for “any conversation or discussion” made by researchers from WHOI regarding their studies on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The court applied a balancing test that weighed BP’s need for the requested information against the burden placed on WHOI, and required the WHOI researchers disclose internal pre-publication materials relating to the studies cited in the government report.

Read More...

Posted On May - 19 - 2013 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
books

Creating full-text s

Creating full-text searchable database of copyrighted works is “fair use” By ...

Hacked By Over-X

European Union Court

European Union Court of Justice Holds that Individuals Browsing Websites ...

Photo By: André Natta - CC BY 2.0

Georgia Supreme Cour

Georgia Supreme Court Takes Chan v. Ellis Appeal to Redefine ...

Icon-news

Federal Circuit Flas

By Kellen Wittkop Appeal of a contempt order for violation of ...

invisalign-braces

ITC’s review of an

ITC’s review of an ALJ’s order was not procedurally sound By ...