A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Federal Circuit Decisions’ Category

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Kathleen McGuinness

Two contested patent terms upheld as means-plus-function

Judgment of damages sufficient to render plaintiff a prevailing party for fee awards


Posted On Oct - 16 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Applies Alice to Deny Subject Matter Eligibility of Digital Imaging Patent

By Amanda Liverzani – Edited by Mengyi Wang

In Digitech Image Technologies, the Federal Circuit embraced the opportunity to apply the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alice to resolve a question of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101. The Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment on appeal, invalidating Digitech’s patent claims because they were directed to intangible information and abstract ideas.


Posted On Aug - 5 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Grants Stay of Patent Infringement Litigation Until PTAB Can Complete a Post-Grant Review

By Kyle Pietari – Edited by Insue Kim

Reversing the district court’s decision, the Federal Circuit granted a stay of patent infringement litigation proceedings until the PTAB can complete a post-grant patent validity review. This was the court’s first ruling on a stay when the suit and review process were happening concurrently.


Posted On Jul - 22 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief 

By Amanda Liverzani

Dismissal of Trademark Registration Opposition Affirmed Despite Pronunciation Error

Non-Infringement of Cellular Network Patents Affirmed

Federal Circuit Finds it Lacks Subject-Matter Appellate Jurisdiction Over Patent Infringement Case

Posted On Jul - 21 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Specification Disavowal Limits Claim Scope of Host Patents

By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Suzanne Van Arsdale

The Federal Circuit unanimously affirmed a decision of the International Trade Commission, which had held that Intel Corporation and other intervenors did not violate 19 U.S.C. § 1337 because Intel’s products were not covered by X2Y Attenuators, LLC’s patents. X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, slip op. at 2. While the language of the claims encompassed the accused products, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s narrow claim construction based on specification disavowal.


Posted On Jul - 15 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Federal Circuit Cour

By Seán Finan – Edited by Grace Truong McRO, Inc. v. ...


Flash Digest: News i

By Alex Noonan – Edited by Filippo Raso California Supreme Court ...


Second Circuit Holds

June Nam - Edited by Ding Ding TCA Television Corp. v. ...

Fed. Cir. Flash Digest

Flash Digest: News i

By Wendy Chu - Edited by Kayla Haran Delaware Supreme Court ...


Federal Circuit Flas

By Haydn Forrest - Edited by Henry Thomas Affinity Labs of ...