A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Federal Circuit Decisions’ Category

Specification Disavowal Limits Claim Scope of Host Patents

By Mengyi Wang – Edited by Suzanne Van Arsdale

The Federal Circuit unanimously affirmed a decision of the International Trade Commission, which had held that Intel Corporation and other intervenors did not violate 19 U.S.C. § 1337 because Intel’s products were not covered by X2Y Attenuators, LLC’s patents. X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, slip op. at 2. While the language of the claims encompassed the accused products, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s narrow claim construction based on specification disavowal.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief

By Kellen Wittkop

Dismissal of Suit for Violation of False Marketing Affirmed Due to Lack of Standing after Elimination of qui tam Provision

Summary Judgment Affirmed for Subject Matter Ineligibility of Claims for Infringement of “Device Profile” Generation and Use

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 15 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief 

By Amanda Liverzani

Non-Infringement Decision on Hospital Bed Patents Reversed for Erroneous Claim Construction

Patents for Eyelash Growth Treatment Invalidated Based on Obviousness

Constitutionality of “First-Inventor-to-File” Regime Still Undecided

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 6 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Federal Circuit Flash Digest: News in Brief 

By Max Kwon

Nonprofit advocacy group fails to show “injury in fact”

Court upholds duty to disclose mediator’s personal relationship with defendant

Claim dismissed as indefinite for resting on patent lacking specfic algorithm

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 1 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Supreme Court Holds Liability for Induced Infringement of Method Patent Only if All Steps Attributable to One Person

By Kyle Pietari – Edited by Suzanne Van Arsdale

A unanimous Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit in holding that there can be no inducement liability without a statute-based direct infringement. This prevents liability for would-be infringers who collaboratively complete a claimed method, but neither completes every step.

Read More...

Posted On Jun - 24 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
91ea09a6535666e18ca3c56f731f67ef_400x400

Privacy Concerns in

By Sabreena Khalid – Edited by Insue Kim Following scandals earlier ...

free-speech

San Francisco Court

By Jens Frankenreiter – Edited by Henry Thomas S. Louis Martin ...

European union concept, digital illustration.

EU Unitary Patent Sy

By Saukshmya Trichi – Edited by Ashish Bakshi Advocate General’s Opinion ...

computer-typing1

California Sex Offen

By Jesse Goodwin – Edited by Michael Shammas Doe v. Harris, ...

nsa-tracking-phone-records-325x337

Congress Fails to Pa

By Henry Thomas – Edited by Paulius Jurcys USA FREEDOM Act ...