A student-run resource for reliable reports on the latest law and technology news

Archive for the ‘Entertainment’ Category

District Court Holds that Internet-Based Television Provider, FilmOn X is Entitled to a Compulsory License

By Anne Woodworth – Edited by Henry Thomas

The U.S. District court for the Central District of California ruled that an online streaming service that rebroadcasted network television fit the definition of a cable company, and was entitled to compulsory licensing under § 111 of the Copyright Act.  The order relied on the Supreme Court’s Aereo decision, which held that internet streaming was fundamentally the same as cable. The ruling conflicts with a Second Circuit case decided on similar facts, and is immediately appealable.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 27 - 2015 Add Comments READ FULL POST

Radio Company Violates Common Law Copyright by Publicly Performing Pre-1972 Recordings

By Lan Du – Edited by Asher Lowenstein

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Sirius XM violated NY common law copyright in reproducing and publicly performing pre-1972 sound recordings by The Turtles.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 30 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

District Court Grants a Preliminary Injunction Against Aereo’s Live TV Features 

By: Olga Slobodyanyuk, Edited by: Saukshmya Trichi

On October 23, the District Court for the Southern District of New York granting a preliminary injunction rejected Aereo’s claim that it is a cable system, thus being entitled to a compulsory license. The injunction restrains Aereo from retransmitting live TV retransmission features and copyrighted programs.

Read More...

Posted On Nov - 4 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Ninth Circuit Rejects Fox’s Request to Shut Down Dish Services, Despite Aereo Decision

By Sheri Pan – Edited by Insue Kim

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Fox’s motion for a preliminary injunction.  Fox argued that the technologies would irreparably harm Fox because they violate copyright laws, but the Ninth Circuit ruled that the district court did not err in finding that the harm alleged by Fox was speculative, noting that Fox had failed to present evidence documenting such harm.

Read More...

Posted On Jul - 22 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST

Flash Digest: News In Brief
By Olga Slobodyanyuk

Amici urge the Ninth Circuit to reconsider its ruling in the “Innocence of Muslims” case

Record companies sue Pandora for royalties on songs made before 1972

Alleged Heartbleed hacker arrested

Read More...

Posted On Apr - 20 - 2014 Comments Off READ FULL POST
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • GooglePlay
Television

District Court Holds

By Anne Woodworth – Edited by Henry Thomas Order: Fox Television ...

Neiman Marcus

Data Breach Victims,

By Brittany Doyle – Edited by Ariane Moss Remijas v. Neiman ...

Magnifying Glass

How Far Can Law Enfo

By Kasey Wang – Edited by Ariane Moss State v. Rindfleisch, ...

Russia & China Cropped

Russia’s “Right

By Brittany Doyle - Edited by Ken Winterbottom The legislatures in ...

Avvo Logo Cropped

Washington Appeals C

By Leonidas Angelakos – Edited by Olga Slobodyanyuk Thomson v. Doe, ...